Revisiting the 1897 Shillong and 1905 Kangra earthquakes in northern India: Site Response, Moho reflections and a Triggered Earthquake
نویسندگان
چکیده
Re-valuated instrumental magnitudes and intensity distributions for the Mw8.0 Shillong Plateau earthquake of 1897 and the Mw7.8 Kangra earthquake of 1905, combined with newly available geodetic constraints on rupture geometries, allow us to compare observed distributions of intensity with those predicted from theoretical models for shaking produced by each earthquake. The difference between predicted and observed shaking is interpreted in terms of the site response of the Ganges and Brahmaputra basins. As expected, these comparisons identify regions of enhanced shaking near the main rivers. We infer amplifications of 1-2 intensity units, corresponding to an amplification factor of 2-4 in peak ground acceleration. We also find two unexpected results in our comparison of observed and predicted shaking from the Kangra earthquake: 1) The epicentral region is surrounded by a halo of enhanced intensity at 150-200 km radius and 2) The Dehra Dun region was the locus of a broad region of anomalously high intensities. We interpret the former result as the signal from post-critical Moho reflections and the latter observation as a probable second large earthquake (M>7) at 30-50 km depth triggered within minutes of the 1905 mainshock. These results have important consequences from future earthquakes in the Himalaya.
منابع مشابه
Site response of the Ganges basin inferred from re-evaluated macroseismic observations from the 1897 Shillong, 1905 Kangra, and 1934 Nepal earthquakes
We analyze previously published geodetic data and intensity values for the Ms = 8.1 Shillong (1897), Ms = 7.8 Kangra (1905), and Ms = 8.2 Nepal/Bihar (1934) earthquakes to investigate the rupture zones of these earthquakes as well as the amplification of ground motions throughout the Punjab, Ganges and Brahmaputra valleys. For each earthquake we subtract the observed MSK intensities from a synt...
متن کاملSpecial Section: Intraplate Seismicity
Re-evaluated intensity distributions for the 1897 Mw 8.0 Shillong and the 1905 Mw 7.8 Kangra earthquakes, combined with geodetic constraints on rupture geometries, allow us to compare observed distributions of intensity with theoretically predicted shaking. The difference between predicted and observed shaking is interpreted in terms of the site response of the Ganges and Brahmaputra basins. Th...
متن کاملRecurrent seismicity in Rajasthan State in the tectonically stable NW Indian Craton
Indian peninsular region comprises several Archean cratonic blocks (Dharwar, Bastar, Singhbhum, Aravalli – Bundelkhand), bordered by Proterozoic mobile belts. Therefore, this region is considered as tectonically stable and designated as the least vulnerable region to earthquake hazard except the still active Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ). The latter is a major suture between southern and ...
متن کاملPlateau Pop-up during the 1897 Assam earthquake
The great Assam earthquake of 12 June 1897 reduced to rubble all masonry buildings within a region of NE India roughly the size of England, and its felt area exceeded that of the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake. Hitherto it was believed that rupture occurred on a north-dipping Himalayan thrust propagating south of Bhutan . We show here that this view is incorrect. The northern edge of the Shillong Plate...
متن کاملEntertaining a Great Earthquake in Western Nepal: Historic Inactivity and Geodetic Tests for the Present State of Strain
A 500-800 km long segment of the Himalaya bordered by the rupture zones of the great Bihar, 1934, and Kangra, 1905, earthquakes has not experienced a great earthquake for at least 200 years, and perhaps for as long as 750 years. The rate of occurrence of earthquakes is evidently too low to accomodate Indo/Tibetan slip which must therefore be accomodated by creep or occasional great earthquakes....
متن کامل